|
Index
of Articles
Creating Consensus on Family
Land Use and Distribution
by Olivia Boyce-Abel
When large and valuable parcels of
land pass from one generation to the next, they often carry with
them unresolved problems. Some heirs may wish to preserve the land
in the family while others may wish to dedicate the land for conservation.
Still others may wish to develop all or some portion, and others
may wish to change the productive use. Often the land represents
a substantial portion of the inherited wealth, and some of it may
need to be sold to pay debts, provide liquidity or pay taxes. To
resolve their conflicts over land issues, family members need to
arrive at consensus, that is, a common understanding among all the
parties. In order for consensus to occur the families need to be
willing to meet and actually do so in order to resolve whatever
their land issues are.
Family Meeting Process
The process of reaching consensus usually requires a series of family
meetings over a period of time. The length of time will vary according
to the complexities of issues in dispute, the personal dynamics
among family members, and the rapidity with which agreement can
be reached. Intervals between meetings give family members an opportunity
to do their homework in the interim. Homework includes meeting with
individual attorneys, accountants, spouses, and heirs as well as
allowing time for environmental studies, appraisals, surveys, etc.
Frequently scheduled meetings held every two or three months over
a year or so are often effective. Further, frequently scheduled
meetings help maintain the decision-making momentum within the group.
For family members to feel comfortable expressing themselves, it
works best for the sessions to be closed to 'outsiders'. However,
if possible, sessions should include spouses, heirs and those who
will be directly affected by the decisions made. Land trust directors,
accountants, attorneys, and other advisors need to show sensitivity
by attending only for the purpose of imparting information.
The assistance of a professional neutral facilitator can help family
members to own the process as well as arrive at consensus on what
they want to do with the land.
Professional Facilitation / Mediation
Based on both my personal and professional experience I know that
families reach more thoughtful, solid decisions about the future
of their lands when their sessions are professionally facilitated
/ mediated. While the roles of facilitator and mediator are akin,
they also differ.
A competent facilitator can organize and focus meetings, lay ground
rules, and make sure everyone is heard in orderly fashion. He or
she treats members of the group with evenhanded respect. He/she
listens well, gives active feedback, and recognizes all participants
while maintaining impartiality. A competent mediator has all of
the facilitator's skills, but also is skilled at helping family
members to:
- solve problems
- empathize with different viewpoints
- arrive at conflict resolution
- help everyone reach consensus
- achieve a fair equitable balance
- create a sense of harmony in conflict resolution
- preserve and actually strengthen family ties
Especially in highly complex situations where there is a wide
disparity of viewpoints a mediator is often essential to achieve
consensus.
A skilled professional facilitator or mediator is important precisely
because he or she does not have a vested interest in the outcome.
By training, both facilitators and mediators are neutral. They have
no history of family association or relationships. For example a
facilitator/ mediator should not be a longstanding family advisor.
Often such a person has failed to listen to one individual's wishes
at an earlier time, or worse, disputed them. A facilitator/ mediator
should not be someone previously hired by one family member so other
members question his or her prior allegiance. No matter how fair
a family member is, if he or she has a personal stake in the outcome
and facilitates the sessions, it is impossible for him or her to
maintain true impartially. Someone is certain to feel unfairly treated
and, as a result, not buy in to either the process or the final
solution.
The careful professional facilitator begins by conducting confidential
interviews with each family member before the first group session.
The purpose of these stake holder' interviews is to determine how
far apart or close together the family members' goals actually are.
The trained facilitator makes certain that everyone is heard on
an ongoing basis throughout the process. The professional mediator
takes the process one step further by bringing people with different
interests to consensus.
If a family is in litigation or serious adversarial posturing,
a professional mediator is needed. Because a facilitator is not
always a trained mediator, he/she may not be capable of moving people
from conflict to consensus. A trained mediator can always facilitate
family meetings. In fact, a mediator is frequently the best choice
because well-facilitated meetings usually disclose the existence
of disputes which can then be resolved by a skilled mediator.
In the end, all of the family members need to own the process in
order to fully support the final decision.
Further Reading on Effective Group Decision-making:
Fisher, Roger and William Ury. Getting to Yes: Negotiating
Agreement Without Giving In
Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1981
Fisher, Roger and William Ury. Getting Together: Building Relationships
As We Negotiate
New York, Penguin, 1988
Recommended Reading on Conservation Easements and Tax Planning:
Land Trust Alliance. Conservation Options: A Landowner's
Guide
Washington, D. C., Land Trust Alliance, 1993
Small, Stephen. Preserving Family Lands
Boston, Landowner Planning Center, 1992
Small, Stephen. Preserving Family Lands: Book II
Boston, Landowner Planning Center, 1997
Englund, Gregory. Beyond Death and Taxes
Boston, Estate Planning Press, 1993
Olivia
Boyce-Abel, Family
Lands Consulting
1003 Smith Grade, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
1996. All rights reserve
|